HP 250 G4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80C5
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151124
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 16 '17 at 03:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Memory 1.85
1-Core 5.9
2-Core 39.5
6% 15.8 Pts
4-Core 39.4
8-Core 41.6
5% 40.5 Pts
64-Core 40.5
2% 40.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 80C5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 2.31
1% 1.81 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 2.35
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
659GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 59.6
Mixed 76.8
53% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.08
24% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 4.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 2.4
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 487
8% 487 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback