Average Bench: 20.8% (1346th of 1358)

Based on 14,478 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF000406C3, Model: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz
Poor: 10%Average: 20.8% Great: 28%
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Very poor average bench

The Intel Celeron N3050 averaged 79.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 34.2Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 22.9Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Celeron N3050 is just 18.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Celeron N3050 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 44.1Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 45Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 14,478 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.6 Memory 34.2 47.8
11.5 1-Core 22.9 26.8
17.6 2-Core 42.1 53.4
21.7% 33.1 Pts
Min Avg Max
22.6 4-Core 43.7 53.5
25.2 8-Core 45 53.7
6.05% 44.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
24 64-Core 44.1 53
3% 44.1 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 46.4
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 31
24% 32.1 Pts
4-Core 47.2
8-Core 33.6
6% 40.4 Pts
64-Core 49.4
3% 49.4 Pts
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 46.1
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 45
26% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 39.2
8-Core 46.8
6% 43 Pts
64-Core 42.7
3% 42.7 Pts
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 43.7
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 51.2
27% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 53.1
8-Core 52.9
7% 53 Pts
64-Core 51.5
4% 51.5 Pts
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 43
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 53.6
27% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 51.5
7% 51.8 Pts
64-Core 53.8
4% 53.8 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 40.1
1-Core 24.5
2-Core 49.6
25% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 50.6
8-Core 44.3
7% 47.4 Pts
64-Core 45.7
3% 45.7 Pts
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 35.7
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 30.7
21% 30 Pts
4-Core 38.6
8-Core 38.3
5% 38.4 Pts
64-Core 40.2
3% 40.2 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 32.9
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 44
21% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 45.4
6% 46.8 Pts
64-Core 37.7
2% 37.7 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 21.6
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 36.5
17% 27.8 Pts
4-Core 46
8-Core 53
7% 49.5 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 17.3
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 41.8
16% 26.7 Pts
4-Core 49.1
8-Core 50
7% 49.5 Pts
64-Core 48.3
3% 48.3 Pts
14,478 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 54,681,889 CPUs tested.

Typical Celeron N3050 Builds (Compare 22,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $22

Popular Celeron N3050 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Celeron® Processor N3050 (2M Cache, up to 2.16 GHz)
Code NameBraswell
Launch DateQ1'15
Processor NumberN3050
# of Cores2
# of Threads2
Burst Frequency2.16 GHz
Cache2 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$107.00
Clock Speed1.6 GHz
Max TDP6 W
Scenario Design Power4 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics
Graphics Base Frequency320 MHz
Graphics Burst Frequency600 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI
Wireless DisplayYes
# of Displays Supported3
Quick Sync VideoYes
InTru 3D TechNo
Clear Video HD TechYes
Intel InsiderNo
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Graphics Video Max Memory8 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR3L-1600
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

I/O

USB Revision2.0/3.0
# of USB Ports5
General Purpose IOYes
UARTYes
Total # of SATA Ports2
Integrated LANNo
Max # of SATA 6.0 Gb/s Ports2

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1
Max # of PCI Express Lanes4

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)No
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Rapid Storage TechNo
Smart Connect TechNo
Secure BootYes
HD Audio TechYes
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)No
Small Business AdvantageNo
Smart Response TechNo
4G WiMAX Wireless TechNo
Virtualization Tech for Itanium (VT-i)No

Package

Package Size25mm x 27mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1170

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardNo
Trusted Execution TechNo
Anti-Theft TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

13 months ago.

I use it from 2017 to 2021. It's really bad, you can't watch 1080p content on it. moreover it is an extremely slow cpu for downloading software too. Never use this cpu again. You can't be productive on a such low performance. if you have it I recommend you switching to a 4 core cpu- from amd or Intel with a newer architecture.


Good

3 months ago.

this is so horrible, it isn't even sufficient for web browsing. what was Intel thinking? you might as well go with a i3 to relieve brain pains from waiting so long for content to load.


Liked

23 days ago.

Comment 

Don't even bother with Windows 10 on this processor, you would lose your sanity before you even have a gram of enjoyment out of it, to have any hope of using it in 2021, just install a lightweight version of Linux to make this 6 year old Celeron processor at the very least usable.—Jan '21


Terrible

19 months ago.

Bruh this CPU is slower than a 12 year old Core Duo P800. I can’t even browse the web smoothly and can’t hardly multitask when doing assignments and projects. I even upgraded it’s HDD into an SSD bit it’s stil daaanm slow when it comes to browsing and multitasking... What I can say is I’d rather use a 12 year old core duo P800 CPU equipped laptop paired with SSD than using this snail sh*t that can’t even browse properly


Poor

2 years ago.

It's a very power-saving processor that TDP is only 6 watts, it don't even need a heat sink with cooling fan. It can hardware decode 4k video in H.264 format. But its performance is too low so it can hardly do a basicly website browsing smoothly.


Terrible

2 years ago.

Worst CPU ever. Can hardly run 1 Synth in Fl Studio!


Terrible

4 years ago.

Preeeeeeeeeeeeety slow... I cant even pay a agar.io with this cpu and integrated graphics pure potato


Good

17 months ago.

Really slow, much better to just spend an extra $50 on a laptop and get a pentium or even an i3.


Terrible

2 years ago.

Extremelly bad processor :( worse than 10 years old laptops


Terrible

11 months ago.

SLOW!


Terrible

18 months ago.

had a terrible experience with it, to be fair i only had to 2gb of ram and a 32gb SSD but with a 2c/2t processor don't expect a lot from it


Your
opinion?
1358 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $469Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $535Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378Nvidia RTX 3050 $320Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $62SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback