Asus F1A55-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 18:33
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 44.2
14% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 35.5
5% 35.8 Pts
64-Core 5
0% 5 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.81
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.44 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.5 12 7.8 12 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 7
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 12.4
6% 8.32 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.M8FR 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 1.4
MC Mixed 6
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.2 GB/s
Latency 569
7% 569 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $118
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback