HP EliteBook x360 1030 G7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 66% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook x360 1030 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 876D
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 15:08
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 66%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.1% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 521
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 876D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.34
6% 8.29 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 16
10% 12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT-128G-1006 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 172 175 173 172 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung No SPD Data 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4000 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.9% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 25.1
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook x360 1030 G7 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook x360 1030 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback