HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 66% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook x360 1040 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 876D
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 12:00
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 66%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.8% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 59.3
29% 45.8 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 179
17% 141 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 876D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 8.59
6% 9.02 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 16
10% 12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.21%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg50pnv2t04 TOSHIBA 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AFHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 928 932 940 921 942 944 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 966
Write 920
Mixed 516
SusWrite 934
188% 834 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 20.1
63% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 155
115% 154 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 122%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT53E2G32D8QD-046WT: 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4000 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 16.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback