Asrock H110M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '20 at 09:59
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 81 2-Core 154 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 418 37% 312 Pts	64-Core 535 33% 535 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1435) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.7% Above average	Lighting 70.6 Reflection 86.9 Parallax 72.2 58% 76.6 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 76.7 61% 73.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 29 33 35 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 382 Write 368 Mixed 306 SusWrite 55 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 47.3 153% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 97 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 52.4 83% 151 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 114%
Toshib DT01ACA100 1TB 1,368 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 295GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 77 103 100 103 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.8% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 65.5 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 85.4 10% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 1% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 10.1 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $92

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	131x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	118x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
MX500 500GBCrucial $35Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	14x
16G-D4-2400-MR 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 3,744 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $314

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16