Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 15:56
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 107
45% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 267
40% 288 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 18
12% 15.7 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 14
Splatting 18.2
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C1050CLA382 500GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC2OR39G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 11 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 19
Mixed 11
SusWrite 16.4
11% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1118WH.003 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 13.9
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback