Grupo@sitre ALDA+

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	12.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Grupo@sitre ALDA+ (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2581-A5
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071010
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '20 at 20:07
Run Duration	456 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 54.5 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 46.2 29% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 49.6 8-Core 52 7% 50.8 Pts	64-Core 53.6 3% 53.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	4.63% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 5.78 3% 5.61 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 8.17 Splatting 8.96 7% 9.01 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 4.63% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 73 34 35 22 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.1% Very poor	Read 76.2 Write 102 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 38.1 13% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 4.3 16% 5.77 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 69.8 DQ Mixed 13 19% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 104GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 36 49 38 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 51.8 Write 40.1 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 37.3 30% 40 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 74%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 203GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 57 85 54 63 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 82.3 Write 78 Mixed 49.9 SusWrite 60 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 77%
SAMSUNG HD251HJ 250GB 1GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.2 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.8% Very poor	Read 15.2 Write 15.4 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 6.6 19% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 110% 1.13 MB/s

SAMSUNG HD251HJ 250GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 58GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.2% Very poor	Read 21.9 Write 13 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 6.6 18% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 79% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 40%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 145GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 2 1.4 1.8 1.7 1.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.85% Terrible	Read 18 Write 19.4 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 2.2 20% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.63 MB/s

SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 35GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Read 25 Write 19.7 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 6.8 24% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External HDD 1.5TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 139GB free, PID 0b13 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 15 17 16 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 15.7 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 14.9 24% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 18%
Generic External 320GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 59GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 16 15 16 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.98% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 19.1 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 15.6 22% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.98% Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD200HJ 200GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 52GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.8 9.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	7.74% Terrible	Read 23 Write 22.5 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 7.1 24% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.74% Great: 19%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 34GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.6 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 20.5 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 7.3 22% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 19%
Iomega E xternal HD 500GB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 144GB free, PID 0370 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.6 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.97% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 20.4 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 7 23% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.97% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ALDA+ Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Grupo@sitre ALDA+

CPU
Pentium G3220Intel $36Bench 48%, 19,337 samples	10x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	6x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	4x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	11x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SD8SBBU120G1122 120GBSandiskBench 47%, 2,087 samples	5x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x

RAM
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 2,435 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $64

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16