Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '20 at 02:36
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,046
99% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,462
90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.3% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 102
Parallax 87.5
83% 96.9 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 100
Splatting 93.9
79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Sabrent 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 352 310 286 285 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,398
Write 1,165
Mixed 1,207
SusWrite 322
229% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 59
210% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 359
317% 452 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 163%
Great: 176%
Amd-raid PNY CS1311 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: CS13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 113 92 92 93 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
Read 392
Write 362
Mixed 321
SusWrite 110
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 10.5
35% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 74.5
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 74.5
74% 114 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 50%
Amd-raid Array 6 999GB
743GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 345 356 356 356 354 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
206% Outstanding
Read 364
Write 378
Mixed 209
SusWrite 352
239% 326 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 2.9
724% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 206%
Great: 206%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
632GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 95 94 96 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 93.3
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST3000VX009-2AY1 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 135 139 139 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 127
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 131
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.2
201% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 78%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72303 3TB
598GB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 143 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 92.8
Write 100
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 141
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 35.2
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 35.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback