Today's hottest deals

Samsung 930SBE/931SBE/930SBV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 930SBE/931SBE/930SBV  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT930SBE-K58
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 06:02
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 60
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 153
54% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 394
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Sanyo(144D C169) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 7.75
6% 8.57 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7
Splatting 15.3
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD72K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 282 274 268 267 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 685
Mixed 374
SusWrite 291
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 44.6
142% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 474
318% 392 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 249%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930SBE/931SBE/930SBV Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 930SBE/931SBE/930SBV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback