MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 21:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 821
77% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 116
Parallax 107
95% 113 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 83.3
83% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 299
Mixed 14.2
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 17.1
66% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 38.8
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 78.2
49% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
General UDisk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 22.3
Write 18.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 18.8
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 12.3
862% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 13.8
965% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 23.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $982
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback