Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9400 APU (2016 M.SR) 1,803 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 35.8 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 71.9 31% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 76.6 8-Core 67.1 10% 71.8 Pts	64-Core 78.8 5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8381) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 6.77 Parallax 5.22 3% 5.25 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 4.74 3% 3.75 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 153 140 111 113 124 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 237 Write 244 Mixed 224 SusWrite 149 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 11.5 43% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 189 138% 179 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5624-001.A00G 1x8GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 7.1 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	116x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	19x
920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	33x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	20x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	20x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $66

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16