QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory44.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 22:29
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 292
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,112
99% 839 Pts
64-Core 2148
133% 2148 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 57.4
45% 59.7 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 55
Splatting 53.1
48% 60.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 440GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 1376 1397 1382 1379 1379 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 144 144 150 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 147
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 147
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 83 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 87.8
Write 84.5
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 85.1
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 3x16GB
3 of 3 slots used
48GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 39.6
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 36.3
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback