Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 827 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.1% Average	Memory 49.4 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 103 37% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 220 26% 202 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q1 128GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 223 163 169 117 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 340 Write 239 Mixed 152 SusWrite 184 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 27.2 103% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 133 116% 173 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 87%
Sandisk SD6SB1M- 128GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 119GB free Firmware: 706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 211 192 191 137 196 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.4% Above average	Read 251 Write 194 Mixed 165 SusWrite 192 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 23.7 86% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 120 119% 192 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR1781ME68F9 2x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 13.3 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.6 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2640 v2IntelBench 59%, 406 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
SD6SB1M256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 76%, 241 samples	1x
Raid 1 Volume 400GBIntelBench 99%, 9 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70... 256GBSamsungBench 138%, 9 samples	2x
M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1 M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- 128GBSamsungBench 145%, 2 samples	1x
RMR1781ME68F9 RMR1781ME68F9 Samsung M391B5273DH0- Samsung M391B5273DH0- 16GBUnknownBench 87%, 5 samples	1x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $85