Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+
Memory60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 08:55
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 728
65% 547 Pts
64-Core 2,307
143% 2,307 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.5% Very good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 81.7
72% 86.4 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 71.5
68% 85.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 671 675 675 675 675 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 1,827
Mixed 1,162
SusWrite 704
319% 1,430 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 61.9
190% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 544
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 494
363% 479 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 205%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 8x8GB
8 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 35.9
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.5
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 27" 1280 720 MSI30A3 MSI MP271Q
Typical X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback