Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3470-$40
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 101
50% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 94.8
8-Core 92.5
13% 93.7 Pts
64-Core 89.4
6% 89.4 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 098F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.39 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 4.67
Splatting 3.52
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 266 287 241 237 233 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 315
Mixed 329
SusWrite 249
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 35.2
133% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 171
142% 204 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
463GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 120 119 116 116 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 125
Write 113
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 120
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
296% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
408GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 237 237 249 249 249 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 237
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 237
134% 186 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
297% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback