Empty S8030GM2NE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmpty S8030GM2NE  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S8030GM2NE
Memory501.9 GB free of 512 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 13:04
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core
P0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 238
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 943
83% 706 Pts
64-Core 4,426
274% 4,426 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000
Nvidia(10DE 129E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 218
Parallax 219
138% 202 fps
MRender 289
Gravity 229
Splatting 145
172% 221 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 140%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1511 963 616 615 614 621 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,463
Write 2,182
Mixed 1,440
SusWrite 823
385% 1,727 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 81.6
285% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 878
658% 882 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 276%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
889GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1964 2163 1261 1178 1182 1180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2,209
Mixed 1,598
SusWrite 1488
437% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 82.9
272% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 892
672% 903 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 316%
Great: 372%
Lenovo RAID 530-8i 24TB
22.5TB free
Firmware: 5.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 121 122 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
187% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 118
Mixed 425
SusWrite 121
224% 296 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 5.3
2,232% 16 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 38.8
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 30.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 380%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback