Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 04:16
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 687
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 106
Parallax 99.2
88% 104 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 83.9
Splatting 76.3
75% 94.2 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 71 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 1,021
Write 711
Mixed 689
SusWrite 120
141% 635 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 15.3
115% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 54.3
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 71.8
63% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 209%
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
119GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 131 131 131 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 388
Write 150
Mixed 201
SusWrite 128
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 32.5
116% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 39.7
39% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
230GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 148 149 146 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 160
Write 160
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 148
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
286GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 96 94 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 95.4
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 174 173 177 175 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $711
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback