Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 3500+ 141 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 34.7 1-Core 25.2 2-Core 24.5 20% 28.1 Pts	4-Core 24.2 8-Core 26.6 3% 25.4 Pts	64-Core 27 2% 27 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6100 335 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Elitegroup(1019 2601) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.07% Terrible	Lighting 0.13 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.12 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.07% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721616PLA 165GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: P22O SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 14 36 26 36 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6.9 Write 10.6 SusWrite 27.4 11% 15 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 67% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Hdt72252 5DLA380 250GB 362 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 50GB free Firmware: V44O SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 60 61 60 61 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 40.7 Write 45.7 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 59.7 33% 44.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 0.8 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 229 18% 229 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	3x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+AMDBench 31%, 2,693 samples	1x
Athlon 64 3500+AMD $54Bench 33%, 480 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	1x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	1x

SSD
0 480GBCt480bx5Bench 58%, 896 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16