Lenovo 81F4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81F4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181128
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 13:25
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 73.9
58% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 161
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 6.62
5% 7.48 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 14
8% 8.98 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TNF-N3A0A 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 110 68 82 100 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 374
Write 122
Mixed 134
SusWrite 91.6
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 2.1
35% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 156
120% 163 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
279GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 110 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62% Good
Read 107
Write 114
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 110
63% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 075D GR2400S464L17S/8G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.1
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F4 Builds (Compare 880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback