HP Laptop 14-df0xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-df0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8544
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 21:53
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 22
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 67.9
24% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 122
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 8544) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3.5
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT23H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 97 65 78 80 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 362
Write 329
Mixed 320
SusWrite 89.9
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 28.1
90% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 150
119% 166 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 2
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 306
13% 306 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Laptop 14-df0xxx Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 50%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-df0xxx

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $316Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $396Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback