MSI X79A-GD45 (MS-7735)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7735
MotherboardMSI X79A-GD45 (MS-7735)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140212
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 07:09
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 567
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3649) 2GB
CLim: 1437 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 22.6
21% 22.5 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 19
19% 24 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S12 126GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 23 18 17 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 389
Write 40
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 19.3
25% 118 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 10.6
40% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 17.2
14% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 51%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
174GB free
Firmware: 1S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 102 99 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 95.6
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 99.9
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 78%
WD FILEIO 520GB
73GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 14 16 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 79.3
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 15
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 5.1
816% 4.27 MB/s
WD FILEIO 128GB
28GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 15 17 14 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 70.1
Write 65.1
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 15.2
41% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 5.2
844% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 25%
WD FILEIO 80GB
66GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 39 40 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 72.1
Write 68.8
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 38.7
47% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.4
748% 4.13 MB/s
WD FILEIO 520GB
187GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 15 14 17 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
Read 69.1
Write 78.4
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 14.2
44% 58 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 5.1
818% 4.23 MB/s
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
1GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Read 18
Write 10
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 3.5
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0
54% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 12%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
594GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 89.7
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 85.9
103% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79A-GD45 (MS-7735) Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI X79A-GD45 (MS-7735)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback