Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	41.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120106
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '20 at 09:13
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 169 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 559 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 685 42% 685 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.09 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 3.5 3% 3.96 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.09 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 443 Write 438 Mixed 348 91% 410 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 36.4 117% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 359 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 40GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 67.5 Write 69.3 Mixed 79.2 55% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 63GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 142 Write 135 Mixed 72.8 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 156GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 134 Write 140 Mixed 19.5 71% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 150 Write 135 Mixed 94 94% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 6.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 23.7 Write 26.3 Mixed 27.2 20% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.7 281% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 8x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 29.5 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.7 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	75x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	52x
Core i7-3930KIntelBench 77%, 4,060 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	5x
BX500 480GBCrucial $35Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	8x
16G-D3-2133-M 2x8GBUnknownBench 45%, 39 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 64%, 1,012 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $251	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406