Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 162
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 524
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 123
Parallax 110
102% 119 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 118
Splatting 94.8
84% 104 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 96 105 108 103 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
99GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.2% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.6
1% 0.52 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.2%
Great: 32%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
894GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.2
Mixed 0.3
0% 0.25 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade 4J22HKD020VBJK-WV3 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.5% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback