Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130117
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '22 at 08:54
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 504 53% 423 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 42.9 Reflection 36.5 Parallax 56.1 35% 45.2 fps	MRender 32.1 Gravity 44.2 Splatting 25.3 27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 35 35 32 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 329 Write 55.7 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 34.4 26% 121 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 7.7 32% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 56%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 354GB free Firmware: UG220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 209 172 195 201 223 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 424 Write 378 Mixed 300 SusWrite 217 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 13.1 61% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 97.6 DQ Mixed 32.8 45% 82.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 645GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 164 165 165 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 133 Write 102 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 163 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 113%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 768GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 28.2 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 28.7 37% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 23,732 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,547x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	963x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	570x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	313x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	275x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	238x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	177x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	142x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	109x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	91x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	87x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353