Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Motherboard AD12-B
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 21:06
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 143
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 420
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 71
Parallax 88.7
58% 77.2 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 60.3
55% 68.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 920 922 925 926 922 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,366
Write 927
Mixed 880
SusWrite 919
229% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 57.4
196% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 224
207% 317 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 188%
Great: 242%
LSI MegaRAID 8344ELP 499GB
2GB free
Firmware: 1.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 419
Write 86
Mixed 141
159% 215 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 7.5
3,412% 23.9 MB/s
MM0500EBKAE 750GB
2TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 110 113 113 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
40GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 61 59 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 60.4
100% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 15.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback