Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 18:59
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4340-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 148
70% 113 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 271
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 39.1
27% 34.7 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 79 59 48 44 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 457
Write 114
Mixed 122
SusWrite 61.3
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 20.8
117% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 91.2
DQ Mixed 38.2
62% 123 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
74GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 54.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 61.9
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB
3GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 4.1 2.9 4.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
9.82% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.3
6% 5.97 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.1
86% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback