Today's hottest deals

Asus CS-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus CS-B  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 07:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4340-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 164
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 276
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 51 50 46 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 137
Write 50.8
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 49.7
18% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 20
76% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 74.6
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 63.8
48% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 51%
WDC WD40 0UE-32HCT0 40GB
25GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 29 29 25 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 30.3
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 28.7
37% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CS-B Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CS-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback