Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 19 '17 at 09:06
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 203
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 590
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 119
Parallax 103
94% 112 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 335 Series 240GB-$219
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 335u Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 482
Write 203
Mixed 251
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 20.9
116% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 77.8
95% 167 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 92%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$215
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67% Good
Read 113
Write 120
Mixed 137
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.28
94% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67%
Great: 98%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 120
Mixed 117
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.18
90% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER164 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: DN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.4% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 156
Mixed 133
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.25
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback