| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | CMS 7200-5413A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181130 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '20 at 18:29 |
| Run Duration | 83 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 82% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.5%
Above average
|
61% 107 Pts
|
34% 259 Pts
|
18% 298 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 590-$200
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.3%
Above average
|
58% 77.1 fps
|
54% 66.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63% 85.3 MB/s
|
176% 1.13 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
72.5%
Very good
|
76% 26.5 GB/s
|
58% 20.4 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 7200-5413A Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: CMS 7200-5413A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 18x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 1x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $217 |