Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV GENE  (all builds)
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 227
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 665
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 84.8
58% 74.5 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 57
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 312 312 305 305 280 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 452
Mixed 427
SusWrite 289
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 32.8
129% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 250
216% 320 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR Kingston 9905402-670.A00LF Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX Kingston 9905471-015.A00LF 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV GENE Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE - $594

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $790
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback