Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu A8NE-FM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 4%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemFujitsu A8NE-FM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek A8NE-FM
Memory0.7 GB free of 1.75 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Memory 28.2
1-Core 13.4
2-Core 13.2
14% 18.3 Pts
4-Core 19.5
8-Core 20.2
3% 19.9 Pts
64-Core 25.1
2% 25.1 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 16 16 15 14 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 16.9
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 15.8
12% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 512, 512, 256 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 266
15% 266 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback