Fujitsu A8NE-FM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 4%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemFujitsu A8NE-FM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek A8NE-FM
Memory0.7 GB free of 1.75 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Memory 28.2
1-Core 13.4
2-Core 13.2
14% 18.3 Pts
4-Core 19.5
8-Core 20.2
3% 19.9 Pts
64-Core 25.1
2% 25.1 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 16 16 15 14 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 16.9
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 15.8
12% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 512, 512, 256 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 266
15% 266 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback