Acer Aspire X3950

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X3950  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3950
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100505
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 21:12
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 149
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1533 MHz, MLim: 1810 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.19
Parallax 0.19
0% 0.19 fps
MRender 0.33
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 32
20% 22.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,725
Write 26
Mixed 58.7
195% 937 MB/s
4K Read 343
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.3
526% 116 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
251GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,738
Write 24.7
Mixed 51.7
672% 938 MB/s
4K Read 375
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
15,696% 125 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
54GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 13 14 8.7 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29
Write 18.5
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 11.1
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.3
181% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 39%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
344GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 30
Write 21.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 20.7
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 None CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3950 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3950

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback