Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory8.4 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 22:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 108
42% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 146
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 74.5
46% 63 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 43.6
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 146 149 159 170 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 207
Write 144
Mixed 136
SusWrite 154
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 9
47% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 73.1
78% 130 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
44GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 106 109 110 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 130
Write 122
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 107
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
282GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 63 64 61 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 77.5
Write 73.1
Mixed 30
SusWrite 64.4
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI ID:83 0B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI ID:80 AD HMT425U6AFR6A-PB ID:80 AD HMT125U6AFP8C-G7 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1066, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback