PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091216 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 14 '22 at 22:23 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 650-$40
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 146 149 159 170 168 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
44GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 106 109 110 106 MB/s
|
68.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
282GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 63 64 61 66 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $40Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 205x |
Core i7 860Intel $212Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 166x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 101x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 43x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 34x |
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $65 |