Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 132 51% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 181 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 130 131 133 131 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.1% Below average	Read 175 Write 156 Mixed 151 SusWrite 131 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 17.1 57% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 44.9 36% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 124%
Adaptec Array 18TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4TB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 151 152 158 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.5% Average	Read 299 Write 199 Mixed 250 SusWrite 154 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 13.8 64% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 15.3 38% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 95%
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB 1,876 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 59GB free Firmware: 120504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 73 77 82 84 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 168 Write 108 Mixed 69.4 SusWrite 79.7 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 8.5 30% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 7.9 DQ Write 12.9 DQ Mixed 7.6 6% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 30%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 635 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.4 5.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.84% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 5.3 10% 9 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 12.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	21x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	14x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $117Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $78Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	28x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	19x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $496

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16