Compulab uSVR

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compulab uSVR (all builds)
Motherboard	CompuLab uSVR
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141118
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '17 at 20:05
Run Duration	384 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3555LE 47 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - soldered on-board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 104 50% 79.6 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 163 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2211) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 1.44 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XK0480GDPVH 480GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 305GB free Firmware: HPG0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -60473139527666 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4610 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 5 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4610 (F2) Unknown 100 100 284 (F9) Unknown 100 100 153	44.9% Average	Read 259 Write 178 Mixed 183 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 13.1 65% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 71.5 DQ Mixed 42 47% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 62%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 64GB free Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 11 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20152 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1021 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 267 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 220834 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 19568 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 2965070898 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	38.4% Below average	Read 254 Write 81.7 Mixed 124 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 6.26 66% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 53.8 DQ Mixed 34.9 44% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 44%
128gb SATA FLASH DRIVE 128GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 61GB free Firmware: SFDC001D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 16777215 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 884 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 190 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 40 100 257700003880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (A0) Unknown 100 100 157 (A1) Unknown 100 100 16 (A2) Unknown 100 100 0 (A3) Unknown 100 100 155 (A4) Unknown 100 100 20 (A5) Unknown 100 100 20 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1596359323	19.9% Very poor	Read 219 Write 58.5 Mixed 36.5 22% 105 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 7.51 4K Mixed 4.94 26% 7.51 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 80%
Intel SSDSC2BW480A3L 480GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: LF1i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 -73323681652628 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1368 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 211 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1128 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 211 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 406480 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 49 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 406480 (F2) Unknown 100 100 391109 (F9) Unknown 100 100 35655	29.7% Poor	Read 259 Write 115 Mixed 140 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 9.58 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 12.1 34% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 10 13% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 69%
160 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 4GB free, PID 5561 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 21.2 Write 5.7 Mixed 8.12 12% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.78 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 1.18 128% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965527-026.A00LF 2x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.1% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.6 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.7 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Compulab uSVR

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)