ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ESC8000 G3 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus ESC8000 G3 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PG-D24 Series
Memory	124.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 10 '18 at 00:25
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 267 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 226 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 751 71% 588 Pts	64-Core 2,669 165% 2,669 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 38 37% 38.3 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 36.9 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XK0480GDPVH 480GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 125739462557715 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 49 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 31 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 31 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6283 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 25 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6283 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2192 (F9) Unknown 100 100 128	50.4% Above average	Read 505 Write 232 Mixed 356 80% 365 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 10.1 52% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 14.1 DQ Mixed 62 34% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 62%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 9GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 42.1 Write 20.4 Mixed 25.1 34% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 0.22 4K Mixed 0.82 78% 4.16 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA8GL7MMR4N-UH 2x31.5GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 24 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback