Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160525
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 116
55% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2302 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 70
Parallax 67.2
57% 68.9 fps
MRender 79.5
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 69.4
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 255 348 209 369 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 315
Write 393
Mixed 303
SusWrite 264
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 34
121% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 68.4
94% 172 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
561GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 167 155 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 162
Mixed 140
SusWrite 164
117% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 9905403-478.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback