Today's hottest deals

AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191207
Uptime64 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '20 at 07:54
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 36
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 97.5
34% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.31 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.65
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD128GBS800 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 343 334 337 320 319 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 480
Write 377
Mixed 367
SusWrite 332
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 16.7
90% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 41.7
81% 161 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 1TB
882GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 111 112 108 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 243
Write 104
Mixed 123
SusWrite 110
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.7
27% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback