ADD TO PC
BUILD

ION ION

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	ION ION (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek KFSN5-D/IST
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090810
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '17 at 18:15
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2387 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 82 41% 63.4 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 323 29% 244 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 81F0) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	4.46% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 8.58 Parallax 1.91 5% 5.36 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 5.26 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 698.65G 750GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 473GB free (System drive) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 95.4 Write 186 Mixed 143 107% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 3.98 4K Mixed 0.69 179% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 121%
ST325031 8AS 250GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 69GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 32 Write 33 Mixed 17.2 34% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.44 70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 43%
ST932032 5AS 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 6GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.2% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 32.7 Mixed 10.1 30% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.24 36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.9% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 5.7 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback