| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-7PESH1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120717 |
| Uptime | 12.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '20 at 10:20 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
|
45.8%
Average
|
44% 79.1 Pts
|
40% 323 Pts
|
56% 909 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68.3%
Good
|
69% 87.6 fps
|
68% 84.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 71 72 74 79 90 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
50% 67.2 MB/s
|
119% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
5GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
|
130% 175 MB/s
|
330% 2.57 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TRV16G36CA9VLD-Z8 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
15% 5.23 GB/s
|
14% 5.03 GB/s
|
22% 182 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds