Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '20 at 14:29
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 138 2-Core 271 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 724 72% 587 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Sapphire(1DA2 E411) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 117 Parallax 236 113% 164 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 134 Splatting 162 115% 137 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,210 Write 5,912 Mixed 6,138 1,430% 6,420 MB/s	4K Read 608 4K Write 265 4K Mixed 359 1,521% 411 MB/s	DQ Read 1,241 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 878 676% 935 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 143GB free Firmware: JF4OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 76 75 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 121 Write 106 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 74.8 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 68%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 426GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 125 125 125 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 124 Write 126 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 125 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1 165% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 59GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 110 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 99 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 109 66% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 387GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 104 103 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 101 Mixed 52 SusWrite 103 64% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 54%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 37GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 37 Mixed 35.3 40% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.8 116% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB 583 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 181GB free, PID 01de Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 58 58 58 57 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 54.5 Write 37.5 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 56.9 62% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 41%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB 583 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 144GB free, PID 01de Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 93 92 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 87.7 Write 87.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 92.6 102% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 41%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2TB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 115 69 112 99 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 143 Write 141 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 103 143% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.5 189% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB 17,012 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1904 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.6% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21.8 70% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 22.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,620x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	446x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	223x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	404x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	228x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	156x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16