Today's hottest deals

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190718
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 10:12
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 123
2-Core 240
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 781
75% 618 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Gigabyte(1458 3793) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 132
Parallax 125
100% 127 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 131
Splatting 111
92% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1388 979 1515 1810 1832 1145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,357
Write 1,899
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 1,445
402% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 61.1
198% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 502
376% 507 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 267%
Great: 372%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$56
238GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 990 996 579 225 221 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,313
Write 977
Mixed 906
SusWrite 540
208% 934 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 56.4
188% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 522
393% 530 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 168%
Great: 257%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
333GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 82 65 85 85 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 81.5
Write 86.8
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 75.1
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 166 168 168 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 195
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 167
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.5
428% 3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 119 121 121 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 127
Write 110
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 119
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
21GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 15 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 18
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 15.5
28% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 5.7
266% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 24.8
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback