Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 77% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 8377
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '20 at 00:50
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 95%
CPU Throttled 77%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.7% Very poor
Memory 8.58
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 47.4
15% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 151
16% 126 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 8377) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 4.19
4% 5.04 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 9.04
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 360GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 204 167 136 82 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 302
Write 253
Mixed 275
SusWrite 151
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 12.3
36% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 69.8
100% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
769GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 130 130 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 128
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 417
10% 417 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback