Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '19 at 19:55
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88 21,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 129 58% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 194 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 36.6 30% 34.3 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 34.4 30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 96 96 97 92 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 449 Write 359 Mixed 369 SusWrite 133 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 50.1 167% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 252 189% 253 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 124%
Innostor Innostor 64GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 28GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 49 48 49 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 196 Write 45.2 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 48.5 94% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair VS2GB1333D4 Adata 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.5% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.1 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	38x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	27x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	23x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	32x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 6,575 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16