PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel S2600CWR (all builds) |
Memory | 60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180213 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 25 '19 at 16:34 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
72.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples | 7x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 6x |
Xeon E5-2630 v3IntelBench 69%, 1,838 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 4x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 3x |
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples | 3x |
Raid 0 Volume 7.5TBIntelBench 126%, 21 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 112% - Outstanding | Total price: $223 |