Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '19 at 07:02
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 90.8 1-Core 151 2-Core 292 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 845 80% 664 Pts	64-Core 1,255 78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 865F) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 178 Reflection 169 Parallax 166 145% 171 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 151 Splatting 109 116% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,694 Write 2,020 Mixed 1587 396% 1,767 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 49.9 196% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,239 DQ Write 1,106 DQ Mixed 1,152 870% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 174 174 174 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 162 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 172 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra 250GB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 151GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 22 22 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 23 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 20.1 34% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.7 168% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3600 2OZ 4x8GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 25 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 22.7 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	863x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	569x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	493x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	283x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,290

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16