Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 60.6 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 91.9 43% 69.3 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 141 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 542 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 5.69 5% 5.83 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 8.48 6% 6.51 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 373GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 20 20 18 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.2 5 4.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 23.7 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.5 10% 9.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471B5673EH1-CH9 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9.6 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	109x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	36x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	26x

RAM
HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GBKingstonBench 24%, 207 samples	13x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	9x
HMT125S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 27%, 878 samples	9x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16