Asus K52JK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus K52JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52JK
Memory	1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 54.5 2-Core 102 45% 73.6 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 139 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v 267 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C42) 1GB Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.692.1.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 1.8 2% 2.47 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 106 106 104 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 85.3 Write 94 Mixed 31 SusWrite 104 57% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 6 7.2 6 8.3 7.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 28.6 Write 17 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 6.3 14% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 41% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AD73I1B1672EG 06C1 SSY3128M8-EDJED 3GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52JK Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JK

CPU
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	7x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	5x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples	16x
Mobility Radeon HD 545vATIBench 1%, 267 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SSDNow V+200 240GBKingston $193Bench 72%, 568 samples	1x

RAM
AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 997 samples	5x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	2x
99U5428-040.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 640 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $30

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16