Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Memory 31.1 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 38.9 19% 29.8 Pts	4-Core 37.8 8-Core 41 5% 39.4 Pts	64-Core 36.9 2% 36.9 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 106D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 2.38 1% 2.08 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.26 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 23.7 Write 4.5 Mixed 6 11% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.5 73% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H5TC4G63CFR-PBA 1x2GB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.78% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 0.9 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 0.3 2% 0.73 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM